Balkin– Con Law Fall 2019 Syllabus

conlaw.net

Constitutional Law

Professor Jack M. Balkin

Yale Law School

Syllabus

Unless otherwise noted, all page references are to Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar and Siegel, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (7th ed. 2018).

Supplemental Materials are directly linked to or are available on Canvas.

We will meet regularly in Baker Hall, Room 420 on Mondays from 10:05am to noon and on Tuesdays from 4:10pm to 6:00pm unless otherwise noted. During the first month of class we will have a few classes on Fridays, also in Room 420.

My regular office hours are on Tuesdays from 6:10pm to 7:10pm in Baker 411B, immediately after our Tuesday class.

1. Introduction: Interpreting the Constitution (8/26/2019)

  • The Constitution of the United States, pp. 1-16
  • Note on the First Bank of the United States, pp. 27-32
  • Note on the Second Bank, pp. 37-39
  • McCulloch v. Maryland and Notes, pp. 39-53, 66-74
  • Note on the Louisiana Purchase, pp. 154-159
  • Note on Constitutional Interpretation, pp. 54-66

2. Constitutional Interpreters I (8/27/2019)

A. Judicial Review

  • Note on Judicial Review before Marbury, pp. 108-111
  • The Election of 1800 and Notes, pp. 112-114
  • Note on Political Early Struggles over the Federal Judiciary, pp. 114-117
  • Stuart v. Laird and Notes, pp. 117-119
  • Marbury v. Madison and Notes, pp. 120-139
  • Theories of Judicial Review, pp. 144-154 (note Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, pp. 146)
  • Notes on Jurisdiction Stripping, Standing and Political Questions, pp. 139-144

3. Constitutional Interpreters II (8/28/2019 at 10:05am)

A. What if the President disagrees with the Court about the meaning of the Constitution?

  • Andrew Jackson’s Veto Message and Notes, pp. 76-81
  • Note on Presidential Authority, pp. 81-84

B. “Commerce among the several states” and the “General Welfare”

  • Gibbons v. Ogden and Notes, pp. 187-200
  • Note on Federal Preemption, pp. 200-201
  • Note on Interstate Federalism and the National Economy, pp. 835-842
  • Notes on The General Welfare, Disaster Relief, and Internal Improvements, 208-216

4. The Jacksonian Era and Slavery (9/03/2019)

  • Note on the Natural Law Tradition and Calder v. Bull, pp. 166-174 (Note particularly Barron v. City of Baltimore, p. 172)
  • Note on The Jacksonian Era, pp. 217-219
  • Note on Slavery, p. 245
  • Notes and Prigg v. Pennsylvania, pp. 251-260
  • Note on Prelude to Secession, pp. 260-263
  • Dred Scott v. Sandford and Notes, pp. 263-288
  • Frederick Douglass, The Constitution of the United States: Is it Pro-Slavery or Anti-Slavery? and Notes, pp. 288-293
  • Notes on Secession, pp. 296-306

5. The Civil War and the War Power (9/06/2019 at 2:10pm)

6. Reconstruction and Reaction I– Adoption of the Reconstruction Amendments  (9/09/2019)

  • The Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, pp. 11-12
  • History of the Adoption of the Reconstruction Amendments, pp. 331-338
  • Senator Howard’s Speech on the Fourteenth Amendment and Notes, pp. 338-347 
  • Note on What the Fourteenth Amendment Did Not Say, p. 347
  • Note on The Unusual Procedural History of the Fourteenth Amendment, pp. 348-356
  • Note on The Fifteenth Amendment, pp. 356-357
  • The Slaughterhouse Cases and Notes, pp. 359-376
  • United States v. Cruikshank and Notes, pp. 376-377
  • James C. Ho, “Defining American”

7. Reconstruction and Reaction II–The Privileges and Immunities of National Citizenship (9/10/2019)

  • Women’s Citizenship in the Antebellum Era, pp. 182-186
  • Bradwell v. Illinois and Notes, pp. 377-380
  • Note on The New Departure and Minor v. Happersett, pp. 380-386
  • Strauder v. West Virginia and Notes, pp. 391-398
  • The Civil Rights Cases and Notes, pp. 398-412
  • Notes on the meaning of “slavery,” pp. 485-487

8. Reconstruction and Reaction III– The Reconstruction Amendments and Race (9/13/2019 at 2:10pm)

  • Plessy v. Ferguson and Notes, pp. 412-426
  • Charles Black, the Lawfulness of the Segregation Decisions, pp. 426-427
  • Note on The Spirit of Plessy and Giles v. Harris, pp. 427-431

9. The Lochner Era (9/16/2019)

A. Police Powers Jurisprudence

  • Notes on the Rise of Due Process Protection Against State Economic Regulation, pp. 456-460
  • Note on the Application of the Bill of Rights to the States, pp. 460-463
  • Lochner v. State of New York and Notes, pp. 463-469
  • Notes on the Jurisprudence of the Lochner Era, pp. 469-481 (note Coppage v. Kansas, pp. 472-473 and Muller v. Oregon, pp. 473-474)

B. The Decline of Police Powers Jurisprudence

  • Nebbia v. New York and Notes, pp. 541-543
  • Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell and Notes, pp. 543-552
  • Notes and West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, pp. 552-555

10. The New Deal and the Emergence of the Modern Paradigm of Judicial Scrutiny (09/17/2019)

  • U.S. v. Carolene Products Co. and Notes, pp. 555-562
  • Williamson v. Lee Optical Co. and Notes, pp. 562-569
  • Note on Constitutional Modernity, pp. 531-532
  • Note on Incorporation of the Bill of Rights Against the States, pp. 532-540

11. The New Deal Struggle over National Power and the Emergence of the Modern Regulatory State (09/23/2017, 09/24/2017)

A. The Court Enforces Dual Federalism

  • Hammer v. Dagenhart and Notes, pp. 494-502
  • Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. and Notes, pp. 502-504

B. The Court Strikes Down Early New Deal Programs

  • Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States and Notes, pp. 591-593
  • Carter v. Carter Coal Co. and Notes, pp. 593-598
  • United States v. Butler and Notes, pp. 598-602

C. The Revolution of 1937

  • Franklin D. Roosevelt, Fireside Chat on the Court Packing Plan, pp. 603-607
  • NLRB v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp. and Notes, pp. 607-608
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt, Speech on Constitution Day, pp. 608-610
  • United States v. Darby and Notes, pp. 610-613
  • Wickard v. Filburn and Notes, pp. 613-616
  • Note on Constitutional Revolution, pp. 616-618
  • Notes on the Taxing and Spending Powers, pp. 618-621

12. The Warren Court and the Civil Rights Movement (09/27/2019 at 2:10pm)

A. The Civil Rights Act of 1964

  • Notes on The Civil Rights Movement and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, pp. 621-627
  • Note on Congressional Power to Pass the Civil Rights Bill, pp. 627-629
  • Heart of Atlanta Motel and Katzenbach v. McClung, pp. 629-633

A. The Voting Rights Act of 1965

  • Note on the Reconstruction Power in the Civil Rights Era, pp. 633-634
  • Note on the Voting Rights Act of 1965, pp. 634-639
  • Notes and South Carolina v. Katzenbach, pp. 639-643
  • Katzenbach v. Morgan and Notes, pp. 643-651
  • Jones v. Alfred Mayer Co. and Notes, pp. 651-654
  • Oregon v. Mitchell and Notes, pp. 654-657

13. The Contemporary Debate over National Power I (10/07/2019)

A. The Commerce Power

  • Introduction, pp. 659-660
  • United States v. Lopez and Notes, pp. 660-678
  • U.S. v. Morrison, pp. 678-680
  • Scarborough v. United States, pp. 680-682
  • Gonzales v. Raich and Notes, pp. 682-686
  • NFIB v. Sebelius and Notes, pp. 686-699
  • United States v. Comstock, pp. 699-704

B. The Taxing Power

  • NFIB v. Sebelius and Notes, pp. 704-712

C. The Spending Power

  • Note on the Spending Clause and South Dakota v. Dole, pp. 712-714
  • NFIB v. Sebelius and Notes, pp. 714-727

14. The Contemporary Debate over National Power II (10/08/2019, 10/15/2019)

A. Implied Limits on Federal Regulation of the States

  • New York v. United States and Notes, pp. 797-811
  • Printz v. United States and Notes 1-6, pp. 811-824
  • Note on Cooperative (and Uncooperative) Federalism, pp. 830-835
  • Murphy v. NCAA (available on Canvas)
  • Note on Sanctuary Cities (available on Canvas)
  • Hans v. Louisiana and Notes, pp. 511-513
  • Note on State Sovereign Immunity, pp. 824-829

B. Congressional Power to Enforce the Civil War Amendments

  • City of Boerne v. Flores and Notes, pp. 731-746
  • United States v. Morrison, pp. 746-752
  • Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, pp. 752-759
  • Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, pp. 759-783

C. The Treaty Power

  • Missouri v. Holland and Notes, pp. 507-511
  • Bond v. United States, pp. 727-731

15. The Modern Debate over Racial Equality (10/16/2019 at 10:05am)

A. Brown and Its Legacy

  • Notes on the Background to the School Desegregation Case, pp. 1017-1022
  • Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling v. Sharpe, and Notes, pp. 1023-1030
  • The Southern Manifesto and Notes, pp. 1030-1032
  • Brown and the Original Understanding, pp. 1032-1038
  • Four Decades of School Desegregation, pp. 1038-1053 (skim)
  • Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Notes, pp. 1186-1216

16. The Antidiscrimination Principle (10/21/2019)

A. Anticlassification and Antisubordination

  • Korematsu v. United States and Notes, pp. 1054-1060
  • Loving v. Virginia and Notes, pp. 1061-1073

B. The Reach of the Suspect Classification Doctrine

  • Johnson v. California and Notes, pp. 1073-1074
  • Note on Child Custody and Placement Policies, pp. 1074-1076
  • Note on Government Collection and Use of Racial Data, pp. 1076-1079
  • Note on Four Concepts of Race, pp. 1079-1081

17. What Constitutes Discrimination “based on” Race? (10/22/2019)

A. Discriminatory Intention

  • Early Cases on Racial Discrimination, pp. 1081-1085
  • Griggs v. Duke Power Co. and Notes, pp. 1085-1089
  • Washington v. Davis and Notes, pp. 1089-1094
  • Village of Arlington Heights v. Metro Housing Development Corp. pp. 1094-1095
  • Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney and Notes, pp. 1095-1101

B. Race and the Criminal Process

  • United States v. Clary and Notes, pp. 1112-1116
  • McCleskey v. Kemp and Notes, pp. 1116-1123
  • Brown v. Oneonta and Notes, pp. 1123-1125
  • Racial Profiling and the Equal Protection Clause, pp. 1125-1128

18. Affirmative Action (11/04/2019)

  • Notes and Bakke v. Regents of the University of California, pp. 1128-1137
  • Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., and Notes, pp. 1137-1152
  • Adarand Constructors v. Pena and Notes, pp. 1152-1154
  • Note on Originalism and Affirmative Action, pp. 1154-1159
  • Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, pp. 1159-1186
  • Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (Fisher II), pp. 1216-1226
  • Hua Hsu, The Rise and Fall of Affirmative Action

19. Gender Classifications and Gender Equality (11/05/2019)

  • Frontiero v. Richardson and Notes, pp. 1257-1266
  • United States v. Virginia and Notes, pp. 1287-1306
  • Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney and Notes, pp. 1327-1325
  • Geduldig v. Aiello and Notes, pp. 1335-1339
  • Note on Pregnancy as a Justification for Sex-Differentiated Treatment of Men and Women, pp. 1315-1317
  • Reva Siegel, The Ninteenth Amendment (available on Canvas)
  • Note on the Equal Rights Amendment, pp. 1266-1273
  • Note on ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment today (available on Canvas)

20. Alienage and Other Suspect Classifications (11/11/2019, 11/12/2019)

A. Other Suspect Classifications

  • Other Suspect Bases of Classification, pp. 1360-1363
  • Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center and Notes, pp. 1363-1374

B. Alienage

  • Cases and Notes on Alienage and the Equal Protection Clause, pp. 1227-1247
  • Trump v. Hawaii and Notes (available on Canvas)

21. Equal Protection and Fundamental Rights (11/18/2019)

A. Equal Protection and Fundamental Rights

  • Notes and Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, pp. 1649-1657
  • Note on Protecting the Poor Through the Fourteenth Amendment, pp. 1657-1660
  • Dandridge v. Williams and Notes, pp. 1661-1668
  • San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez and Notes, pp. 1668-1682
  • Note on the Enforceability of Positive Rights, pp. 1688-1694

22. Modern Substantive Due Process: “Privacy,” Sexual Autonomy or Tradition? (11/19/2019)

  • Historical Roots of Fundamental Rights Adjudication, pp. 1377-1382
  • Griswold v. Connecticut and Notes, pp. 1383-1403
  • Note on The Reach of Griswold, pp. 1403-1405
  • Note on Tradition as a Source of Fundamental Rights, pp. 1405-1413
  • Lawrence v. Texas and Notes, pp. 1535-1555
  • Roe v. Wade and Notes, pp. 1414-1428
  • Note: Did Roe Cause the Abortion Conflict?, pp. 1428-1431
  • Abortion and the Equal Protection Clause, pp. 1431-1440

23. Abortion and Gender Discrimination (12/02/2019)

  • Note on Decisions After Roe, pp. 1440-1447
  • Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey and Notes, pp. 1447-1482
  • Gonzales v. Carhart and Notes, pp. 1482-1489
  • Note on Absolute and Incremental Restrictions on Abortion, pp. 1490-1495
  • Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, pp. 1495-1510

24. Sexual Orientation– Due Process or Equal Protection? (12/03/2019)

  • Romer v. Evans and Notes, pp. 1525-1535
  • Note on Liberty, Equality, and Lawrence, pp. 1555-1559
  • Note on Sexual Orientation, Equal Protection, and Heightened Scrutiny, pp. 1559-1566
  • Note on Same Sex Marriage and United States v. Windsor, pp. 1566-1574
  • Obergefell v. Hodges, pp. 1575-1604
  • Note on Backlash and Social Movements, pp. 1604-1607